Humanists and digitheads: what's the difference?
The memory of the brain is associative, that is, the record of new information does not happen at random, but above (together) the already existing data in a certain part of the brain. In the opposite case, the extraction of the required would take the same amount of time as has passed since a specific event till the present moment, reminding a replay of a tape recording.
As for the humanists the main professional activity lies in memorization of all kinds of terms: chemistry, medicine, biology and linguistics, such a process does not have an objectively accurate, but only approximate nature. Partial coincidence in one or several characteristics, even the wrong assonant names lead to memorization of something new (Fig. 506). If people are involved in technical disciplines, where a single inaccuracy can affect the result, the information is not recorded until the complete coincidence of all features (Fig. 505).
http://disman3.ru/-506.jpg
http://disman3.ru/-505.jpg
One of the important questions for psychology is not only the formation of the higher nervous activity based on unification of trashy feelings of the body into groups, which determines our consciousness, as proved by Pavlov through his experiments with the dog and a lamp, but the way it happens. After all, people are unable to unite different qualities of one and the same object at once, but only in pairs, forming priority between the characteristics. The attempt to make simple mathematical calculations with three side-by-side figures: 5+3+4=8+4=12, which leads to the operation with only two of them, is a primitive example thereof. Moreover, if the number of the summed figures was more, the most important would be the general result of previous actions forgetting everything done. Thus, digitheads and humanists differ among themselves on the way they write new information to their brain as a hierarchy of object characteristics. After all, "random association" split the data not allowing making a comparative evaluation of the importance for anything specific, while the "technical thinking" creates a distinct group (Fig. 505b, Fig.506b).
http://disman3.ru/-505б.jpghttp://disman3.ru/-506б.jpg
Considering the pictures of brain memory formation digitheads and humanists, being obtained by logical reasoning (Fig.505, Fig.505b and Fig.506, Fig.506b) it is possible to draw paradoxial conclusions. The aim of ones is to optimize, to turn into a global unifying formula or algorithm, while others look for increasing their knowledge about the object. Thus, in one case, the leader is the one who is able to present knowledge in brief, and in another, tries for better memorization to greater analogies, and so if possible, more colorful and detailed.
For example, although those who are able to think in long logical chains are undoubtedly more talented digitheads if compared to all others, but those who are simpler are loved and respected. Speaking about the humanists everything is exactly the opposite. Love and propensity for a human spread from less cool to more progressive (there are some adjustments to the height of intelligence, because a very simple digithead can have higher education, while the most fit for work can be only an ordinary performer).
For example, if some, due to the impossibility of one-time unification, like to studying one and the same thing while playing, others look for more and more gadgets to this: a racing car with opening doors or more new dresses for a doll.
http://disman3.ru/-507.jpg
Conclusions. Deduction and empiricism, introvert and extrovert, digitheads or humanists, "a perfect man" and the same woman, but for psychologists this should look like dominance of logic or memory of each other and relevant abilities after a specific choice: more retentive than others or able to think in longer logical chains! This is not the fact of differences between people that should determine the science, but the universal cause. I do not say goodbye, because by visualization of schemes it is possible to work wonders, to introduce many new laws: to present bluff and mistakes in their graphical form, to justify delirium or even madness...

Before turning to the study of intellectual deterioration of "Indigo", it is necessary to explain the reasons for gradual increase of memory of the digitheads who are in advanced if compared to others, as well as the logic of thinking of more capable humanists when compared to others (Fig.507). If everything is clear with complex exact sciences: the longer is the chain of logic and the more complex is the object under study, the more simultaneous data should be kept in mind; why should a chemist or a biologist with a doctor start thinking, comparing and drawing conclusions? By increasing the memory capacity, there appear numerous analogies, similar to each other, resulting in the digithead’s need to unify the data under a single term, the algorithm.
For example, modern chemical production has synthesized more than a few million substances, which are annually added with several hundred thousand of new ones. Although it is almost impossible to understand the properties or to remember the characteristics of a particular mixture, but thanks to the basis, any expert can describe some features and derivatives.

Looking at the pictures Fig.506, 506b of visual representation of humanists and without a serious scientific study, it is possible to imagine the reasons for many such notions as impotence and sexual indifference, faith in God with higher education, appearance of phobias and the so-called complexes.
If men like what they see, getting immediately getting all the necessary volume of data required to the brain, having little need to remember, these are able to meet their wife in bed each time like someone else's wife: everything is new and with pleasure if it is appropriate to the beauty of the shape and face. Humanitarian thinking and good memory, hope to such in life and profession, lead to the fact that no matter how beautiful is your wife, in a few months and up to 2-3 years, she becomes of little interest: everything is known and there is nothing new to control the erection of the brain.
If the relationships between the digitheads who love each other develop gradually being intensified in the attachment to family, the more humanists learn about each other, the less interested they are to communicate. If the digitheads who know what love is are ready to do a lot of thing gratuitously in anticipation of deeper relations, in the similar case, the humanists only laugh, knowing about the "distant future".
Due to the fact that because of many simultaneous associations and transition from one object to another (Fig.506b) humanists are not able think of one and the same idea with a long chain of logic, then giving up the false modesty it is possible to say that for a man it is very difficult to self-satisfy and he is ready to pay any money for an intimate relationship with a woman. Not considering a similar case for the digitheads, it is possible to notice two exceptions to the general rule. The most talented digitheads if compared to others, due to their desire to unite everything, even the minutest detail, into a single one, have poor imagination: everything has to be perfectly accurate in the representation of events; that is why as well as among humanists, self-satisfaction is very difficult and they are ready to pay for the weaker sex for intimacy. Leaders among the humanists have so numerous associations that while managing or transmitting valuable information with the appropriate high payment, it becomes possible to confuse a less intelligent companion: deception, bluff and fraud are widely practiced. As the result, since childhood such people, not niggling, look for somebody’s logical inconsistencies to basic idea of presentation, making it possible to build a short-term approximate logical chain: the imagination becomes running with the appropriate opportunity to have sex without a sexual partner (it is visually represented by numerous weakly bound bases, but a lot of multi-storey pyramids).
For example, in a society of "too smart" digitheads due to their desire to see and know everything in details and the corresponding low-imagination, men are able satisfy themselves in sex only when watching a pornographic movie. Humanists are not able to invent anything, but almost any image of a semi naked woman with obviously visible distinctive sex qualities, provide the necessary stimulus for running imagination and excitation. Japan or the United States can serve as an illustration of such practices. Afghanistan with Islam and its prohibitions on pornography and public demonstration of women’s body, give the understanding of the reasons why the countries poor in natural resources have a small desire to work for the family and women without a corresponding stimulus for intimacy.
For example, in the society of humanists due to the children encumbrance, in girlhood having low need in sex a woman diligently sells herself and her body, as she expects future break in relations due to the impending "weakness" of her husband. Due o the possibility of self-satisfaction having low need in the sexual partner, because of future children encumbrance digitheads have no strong desire to engage in long-term marriage bonds with a woman, sometimes only a good dowry is a drive stimulus.
For example,  not only a humanitarian way of thinking negatively affects the ability of the stronger sex "to live with himself", but also a low level of education and culture, not working within his specialty but for "business" and trade, because in this case, memory does not have long and strictly related to each other complex logic chain, but short and loosely bound numerous analogies.
Due to the fact that digitheads “stick” any idea to “everything else", checking for compliance with logic and events, having studied at school at the lessons of biology and zoology the origin of animal species and their transformation into humans, the laws of energy and matter conservation: physics with chemistry; at the lessons of geography and astronomy, planet formation from a hot ball with appropriate stages of transition to the present earthly form: there is no slightest possibility of believing in God and miracles, the Bible writings that say that God has created everything in seven days together with people. Looking at the Fig. 506b we can see that almost any idea can coexist in many other mediators with a diametrically opposed one through the gradual drift with "practically identical neighboring colors", i.e. through analogies.
http://www.imageup.ru/img128/bred695001.jpg
For example, the so-called "fixations", methods of treatment and the name of which appear due to the wish to unite different cultures and nationalities of humanitarian psychologists from the U.S.A., can occur as a consequence of childhood trauma or some kind of strong negative events happened in the nearest past. Moreover, in most of the cases, the patient does not understand the reasons for his fears and phobias, because of unification of all life events by the brain memory (Fig. 506b) any, even a positive event, can cause negative emotions because of the association, which is impossible among the digitheads.
For example, most of women, being simultaneously engaged in different activities caring for child and home, are humanists. The consequence of this among the weaker sex is the appearance of such a notion as "screw up". Any insignificant mistake of a man, carelessness or rudeness can change the mood for indifference or diametrical.
For example, fetishism, as the interest in the female genital organs, either point to the low level of education, or to the humanitarian way of thinking, as for a digithead a single item cannot serve as an incentive.

It would seem that the author had examined in detail the diametric formation of the brain memory of humanists and digitheads, having proved the impossibility of their unification, but nevertheless there is a type of people who "wash away" the logical justification described earlier. Spending a minimum of time for school, attending lessons without textbooks and exercise books, the so called "Indigo" surprise teachers and parents with their "super powers". Even some 10-20 years ago, such people were slighted by others, because they did not know how to communicate in a particular group, humanists and digitheads, or simply, girls and boys, formerly playing and palling separately from each other with their diverse leaders and ideas, now have to humbly wait in line to say a brief remark to the constantly communicating diclinous collective body “united by friendship”.
For example, having visited any of the online sites, the descriptions of "Indigo" children, not pondering into the written, can visually identify the sexual confusion and the corresponding propagated psychology – handsome and obedient boys with blunt bobs and the same, but, on the contrary, naughty girls.
For example, if boys prefer more active games, constantly running, jumping and shouting, and girls after their own habit discuss something all the time, walking within a small territory arm in arm, the "Indigo" combine the like. Nonstop flexible and sudden movements of bodies around the invisible ring are chewed over with replicas and wild discussions of the participants, suddenly appear separating from the main and again uniting into such groups.
Not touching the world-wide policy of dominance of “businessmen” who do nothing, when prestige and, consequently, leadership in the society is not dictated by the priorities of any humanitarian or technical sciences b, but by "the ability to manage people", let us consider two extreme cases of work of the given above schemes (Fig.505, Fig.505b and Fig.506, Fig.506b) - unvarnished talents.
Continuous increase in the length of the logical chain leads to the difficulty of adding new information to the already existing as the qualities of objects and phenomenon surrounding us have many varied and conjoined features. As a result, at the beginning an individual either mistakenly adds new data, spending a lot of effort for retraining or for a very long time and repeatedly digs to the roots of the matter. If the memory of a man is too high, then it means the possibility to add the new data with any characteristic, or even without such. As a result, the logical constructions of such personalities resemble the work of an automated translation from a foreign language: a mass of different thematic texts, easily transitioning from one to another, or delirium.
Seeing the impossibility of infinite perfection of digitheads and humanists there remains to consider the creation of an "all-around developed individual". For faster learning a digithead starts creating false associations, some time later successfully or not trying to understand everything and unite with the already existing while a humanist studies diligently and consistently, remembering and placing on a priority basis the relationship between the phenomenon in the manner of the annotated table of contents and texts. Thus appears the so-called "Indigo" the visual scheme of brain memory formation is in the Fig.505b and Fig.505b - small pyramids in height and "flooring" partly united by the foundations on many parameters.
For example, a digithead unable to remember and mixing the foreign words "Virare" (Up/ Вира) and "Maina" (Down/Майна) has invented to associate them with the name of the drug increasing male sexual power. Consonant with the name Viagra "Virare" has come to mean upward.
For example, a humanist who has “suddenly become wiser” is able not only to solve a physical problem using the learnt method, but also to combine several options into a chain, consistently moving to the desired without a lasting search.
So, it has turned out that while teaching or solving similar problems by the learnt method, their combinations are roughly and readily contrasted by "Indigo" with the most capable humanists and digitheads for the better. But the development of the modern society is not dictated by mindless performers, but by the creators of something new: scientists and creative people. What does it represent in terms of consideration of the illustrations (Fig.505 with Fig.505b and Fig.506 with Fig.506b)? According to the incomplete data in the exact sciences it is necessary to create a universal algorithm which will describe the entire pyramid, but in the conditions of division into separate, this becomes impossible. If there are multiple intersections, the combinatorial way of thinking and chemistry as a science are destroyed.

Examining the schemes of humanists and digitheads (Fig.505b, Fig.506b) it is possible to draw a conclusion that because of "linking the information on any surrounding objects to everything" the digitheads have a very fine calibration of values if compared to other things and each other. Such people are very sorry to spend money buying everything that they really need and "fitting in with the rest." Thinking in the same way about humanists it is possible to draw a diametrical conclusion that they want all at once, they have a poorly developed correct evaluation of values - only by comparing similar to each other.
For example, a digithead almost always intuitively calculates the manufacturing cost of an object, compares it to other objects manufactured under similar technology and materials, but with a different purpose.
For example, having compared a house or an attic with old things of an average American and Japanese, the contrast difference between the "coolest" of the humanists and digitheads is obvious, though the material difference of prosperity and industrial development of the countries is approximately at the same level.
For example, the difference of colors of clothes will certainly distinguish an overdressed humanist from a modestly dressed digithead.

This or that organization of brain memory (ris.505b, ris.506b) can be called a personality. Of course it is formed on the basis of a long process of education and gained experience, physiological characteristics and habits of the body, but still the final result will be in the form of the above given schemes. Thus life satisfaction directly depends on the appropriate frequency of engagement of individual parts of memory, the intensity and completeness required by the brain.
For example, by examining the schemes of brain memory architecture of humanists and digitheads it can be concluded that some will be more in love with a rhythmical track having common between all the musical instruments, while others prefer "classics" with the nuances of sound, bridges and individual hits.
If the wish of a digithead to associate any information with other areas of knowledge leads to a search for common algorithms and formulae, finally appears a kind of universal fundamental unit, the "ideal man" or the law of conservation of energy and matter. In professions, or even in love is formed a personality type with a certain way of behavior and values, whereas any additional "nuance" or lack thereof in the humanists, make different even the twin brothers - divine uniqueness and value.   
For example, having lost a digithead husband, within a very short period of a few months a woman can find happiness with another, feel life as if nothing has changed. Due to the fact that wives of humanists  to any extent take charge "for this" being forced to adapt their style of behavior and the relevant desires of the husband, by virtue of own living with the brain memory and the following long-running certain rituals and courtship required for preparation to sex: intimacy begins with "from scratch" for the girls (in the visual form for the humanists personalism can be presented even by different unification of the same data from the bottom of the pyramid (Fig.506), and in a certain profession a perfect digithead - a unique top of the pyramid (Fig.505b)).
The author could endlessly continue to analyze the diametral psyche of humanists’ and digitheads’ personalities, but because of the existence of discrete levels of consciousness: laborers, performers, managers, directors, artists, whose bottom, due to the low level of education with small short logical chains of satisfaction of natural needs of the body and values, gets close to the "Lyrics", and the mental top to the "physics", it is impossible to continue the investigation, forcing to start another relevant topic.

A lot of different people in many forums ask one and the same questions: "I am a digithead, but I am fond of classical music", "I am a humanist, but do not wear colorful clothes – I like formal suits". How to explain this? It is possible to give formulae and charts, but nowhere in the world, even university professors and academics do not have at least some basic knowledge of general psychology, no need to speak about ordinary consumers, who since their childhood were frightened by Freud and Jung and their terms, all-seeing and all-pervading "subconscious".
It is impossible to have got humanists mixed up with digitheads, but general rules and laws always have exceptions. As it has been pointed out by the author, every profession has performers, managers, business people and scientists with artists. If a “manager” with higher technical education comes to work at a factory as a foreman, his subordinates are specialists of very different professions, and his psychology becomes analogous to a humanist’s: a little of everything, it is possible to be this way and that, almost right. Trying to unite different people into a single team-oriented collective body, he does not behave discretely, but consequently his psychology "softly" changes, along with his clothing and predilections. Holding a similar position a humanist also transforms beyond recognition. If for digitheads any knowledge and information are readily available, there are not secrets - just know how to use the formulae and graphs and think logically, the "chemists" and "doctors" who study for a very, very long time – this is unnatural. In psychology, very sociable people already at school or university start to realize that prompting something to someone they turn long wakes with textbooks into foolishness, that is why more talented have a desire of alienation and respectively there appears a focused specialization and changes in the psyche of the individual. There is no need to give similar examples of scientists and creative people, but I have to note that even in these social categories happen similar processes, but of course of everyday and scientific character being different from each other as well as the comparison of the explosion engine with a boiling kettle designed for a small child.